Springer Lumber Co. v. Putnam

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Springer Lumber Co. v. Putnam

87 A. 1118, 110 Me. 549, 1913 Me. LEXIS 63

DecidedJune 28, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 1118 (Springer Lumber Co. v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Springer Lumber Co. v. Putnam, 87 A. 1118, 110 Me. 549, 1913 Me. LEXIS 63 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,429.16 for damages sustained at its mill and boom, and in driving and 'hauling its logs, by reason of mill waste alleged to have been deposited in the river by the defendant, as upper riparian proprietor.

Upon ¡motion by defendant to set aside the verdict, as against the evidence, it is held:

1. That the evidence justified the jury in finding the defendant liable for 'the .damages sustained.

2. That those damages are not excessive. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,429.16 for damages sustained at its mill and boom, and in driving and 'hauling its logs, by reason of mill waste alleged to have been deposited in the river by the defendant, as upper riparian proprietor.

Upon ¡motion by defendant to set aside the verdict, as against the evidence, it is held:

1. That the evidence justified the jury in finding the defendant liable for 'the .damages sustained.

2. That those damages are not excessive. Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A. 1118, 110 Me. 549, 1913 Me. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-lumber-co-v-putnam-me-1913.