Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett
63 Cal. 245, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 421
Opinion
In our judgment the matter of fixing water rates is not judicial, and for this reason the writ of prohibition cannot be awarded. This has been frequently held by this court. Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett, 63 Cal. 245, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 421 (Cal. 1883).
63 Cal. 245 (Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berry v. Lindsay
182 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Saxtorph v. District Court, Fergus County
275 P.2d 209 (Montana Supreme Court, 1954)
Durant v. City of Beverly Hills
102 P.2d 759 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
State ex rel. Swearingen v. Railroad Commissioners
79 Fla. 526 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Estate of Iglesias v. Bolívar
11 P.R. 548 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
State ex rel. Scharnikow v. Hogan
62 P. 493 (Montana Supreme Court, 1900)
Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San Francisco
22 P. 910 (California Supreme Court, 1890)