Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett

63 Cal. 245, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 421
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 12, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 63 Cal. 245 (Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spring Valley Water Works v. Bartlett, 63 Cal. 245, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 421 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In our judgment the matter of fixing water rates is not judicial, and for this reason the writ of prohibition cannot be awarded. This has been frequently held by this court. Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berry v. Lindsay
182 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Saxtorph v. District Court, Fergus County
275 P.2d 209 (Montana Supreme Court, 1954)
Durant v. City of Beverly Hills
102 P.2d 759 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
State ex rel. Swearingen v. Railroad Commissioners
79 Fla. 526 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Estate of Iglesias v. Bolívar
11 P.R. 548 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
State ex rel. Scharnikow v. Hogan
62 P. 493 (Montana Supreme Court, 1900)
Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San Francisco
22 P. 910 (California Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Cal. 245, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spring-valley-water-works-v-bartlett-cal-1883.