Spring v. South Carolina Insurance
19 U.S. 519, 5 L. Ed. 320, 6 Wheat. 519, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 370
Opinion
denied the motion, but stated that as the object of the respondents was to have the proceeds of the property in litigation, which had been sold by order of the Court below, invested in stocks, such investment might be made by the Court below, notwithstanding the pendency of the appeal in this Court.
Motion denied. a
a
Vide new rule of Court of the present term. Ante, Rule XXXII.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spring v. South Carolina Insurance, 19 U.S. 519, 5 L. Ed. 320, 6 Wheat. 519, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 370 (1821).
19 U.S. 519 (Spring v. South Carolina Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mtula Tashamby Payton v. Sacramento County
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Zhang v. CA Dept. of State Hospitals
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Smith v. CALPIA
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Bejarano v. Lynch
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Gradford v. Warden
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Hill v. Engelbrektson
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Northcutt v. Sacramento Sheriff's Dept.
E.D. California, 2025
(PC) Brannigan v. Rhea
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Smith v. Uzma
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Robertson v. Gutierrez
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Singh v. CDCR
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Venable v. Tally
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Brackett v. Anderson
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Edwards v. Corter
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Peterson v. Leekie
E.D. California, 2024
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
E.D. California, 2024