Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Spring-Mercer Corp. v. Goodman

Spring-Mercer Corp. v. Goodman

126 Misc. 371, 213 N.Y.S. 500, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 571
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 Misc. 371 (Spring-Mercer Corp. v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spring-Mercer Corp. v. Goodman, 126 Misc. 371, 213 N.Y.S. 500, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The nine holes cut through the wire lath and plastering in the ceiling, measuring approximately twelve inches by twelve inches each, do not constitute ordinary wear and tear. The tenant is hable to the landlord for such damage to the ceiling and should make reimbursement to cover the cost of repair.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of eighty dollars and costs.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hyong Jin Kim
15 B.R. 198 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Durbin-Durco, Inc. v. Blades Manufacturing Corp.
455 S.W.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Misc. 371, 213 N.Y.S. 500, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spring-mercer-corp-v-goodman-nyappterm-1926.