Sprigg v. Dix, Et Vir

6 So. 2d 533, 149 Fla. 538, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 829
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 20, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*539 PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said final decree of the Circuit Court, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sprigg v. Dix, Et Vir, 6 So. 2d 533, 149 Fla. 538, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 829 (Fla. 1942).

6 So. 2d 533 (Sprigg v. Dix, Et Vir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bellman v. Yarmark Enterprises, Inc.
180 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)