Spreitzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 1933
DocketNo. 7,096; No. 7,097; No. 7,098
StatusPublished

This text of 22 P.2d 620 (Spreitzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spreitzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, 22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344 (Mo. 1933).

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE STEWART

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe facts and legal propositions presented in these cases, wbicb were tried together, are similar to those in Peel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., ante, p. 334, 22 Pac. (2d) 617.

Upon tbe authority of tbe Peel Case, supra, tbe judgments in these cases are reversed, and the causes remanded to tbe district court of Silver Bow county, with direction to dismiss tbe actions.

Mr. Chief Justice Callaway and Associate Justices Angstman, Matthews and Anderson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
22 P.2d 617 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spreitzer-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-pacific-railroad-mont-1933.