Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co.

22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 73
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 1933
DocketNos. 7,096, 7,097, 7,098.
StatusPublished

This text of 22 P.2d 620 (Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co., 22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 73 (Mo. 1933).

Opinion

The facts and legal propositions presented in these cases, which were tried together, are similar to those in Peel v.Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul Pacific Railroad Co., ante, p. 334, 22 P.2d 617.

Upon the authority of the Peel Case, supra, the judgments in these cases are reversed, and the causes remanded to the district court of Silver Bow county, with direction to dismiss the actions.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY and ASSOCIATE JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, MATTHEWS and ANDERSON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
22 P.2d 617 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spreitzer-v-chicago-etc-rr-co-mont-1933.