Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co.

22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 73
Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1933·No. Nos. 7,096, 7,097, 7,098.·Published

Opinion

The facts and legal propositions presented in these cases, which were tried together, are similar to those in Peel v.Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul Pacific Railroad Co., ante, p. 334, 22 P.2d 617.

Upon the authority of the Peel Case, supra, the judgments in these cases are reversed, and the causes remanded to the district court of Silver Bow county, with direction to dismiss the actions.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY and ASSOCIATE JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, MATTHEWS and ANDERSON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co., 22 P.2d 620, 94 Mont. 344, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 73 (Mo. 1933).

22 P.2d 620 (Spreitzer v. Chicago Etc. R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
22 P.2d 617 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)