Spreckman v. D'Apice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spreckman v. D'Apice

112 A.D.2d 1072, 493 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 1072 (Spreckman v. D'Apice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spreckman v. D'Apice, 112 A.D.2d 1072, 493 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Angelo R. Martinelli as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 10, 1985 for the position of Mayor of the City of Yonkers, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), dated July 31, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application granted, and the Board of Elections of Westchester County is directed to remove respondent Martinelli’s name from the appropriate ballot.

Respondent Martinelli’s certificate of authorization has been rendered invalid in light of our decision in Matter of Jones v Flynn (112 AD2d 1069). Brown, J. P, O’Connor, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Angelo R. Martinelli as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 10, 1985 for the position of Mayor of the City of Yonkers, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), dated July 31, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application granted, and the Board of Elections of Westchester County is directed to remove respondent Martinelli’s name from the appropriate ballot.

Respondent Martinelli’s certificate of authorization has been rendered invalid in light of our decision in Matter of Jones v Flynn (112 AD2d 1069). Brown, J. P, O’Connor, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 1072, 493 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spreckman-v-dapice-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack