Spreckels v. Spreckels

California Supreme Court

Spreckels v. Spreckels

172 Cal. 817

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 28, 1916

DocketS. F. Nos. 6754, 6755, 6756

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Cal. 817 (Spreckels v. Spreckels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spreckels v. Spreckels, 172 Cal. 817 (Cal. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

SHAW, J.

The questions presented on these appeals are all determined in the opinion rendered in ease No. 6753, Spreckels v. Spreckels, ante, p. 775, this day decided. All of the actions had the same purpose and object and are based upon the same allegations. The last three actions were begun to avoid technical objections and doubts as to the proper parties to maintain the action. As we have decided that the actions are not maintainable at all, the question as to the parties in interest is immaterial.

The judgment in each of the above-entitled cases is affirmed.

Melvin, J., Henshaw, J., Lorigan, J., Sloss, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAW, J.

The questions presented on these appeals are all determined in the opinion rendered in ease No. 6753, Spreckels v. Spreckels, ante, p. 775, this day decided. All of the actions had the same purpose and object and are based upon the same allegations. The last three actions were begun to avoid technical objections and doubts as to the proper parties to maintain the action. As we have decided that the actions are not maintainable at all, the question as to the parties in interest is immaterial.

The judgment in each of the above-entitled cases is affirmed.

Melvin, J., Henshaw, J., Lorigan, J., Sloss, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Cal. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spreckels-v-spreckels-cal-1916.