Sprayberry v. Mullins
This text of 66 S.E. 988 (Sprayberry v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being evidence from which it could be inferred that the corn raised in 1907 and sold to the garnishee was the proceeds or produced from part of the corn exempted and set apart to the claimant as head of a family in 1904, it was error, in sustaining the certiorari, to enter a final judgment holding that the purchase-price of the corn was subject to the garnishment, and subjecting it to the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the fi. fa., even though the judge in his discretion might properly have granted a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 988, 7 Ga. App. 360, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprayberry-v-mullins-gactapp-1910.