Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of Florida

Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell

192 So. 2d 4

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1966

DocketNo. 35547

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 2d 4 (Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell, 192 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent Ellis Cantrell is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI