Spratt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Spratt v. State

152 So. 3d 95, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19075, 2014 WL 6488761

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 21, 2014

DocketNo. 5D14-1245

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 95 (Spratt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spratt v. State, 152 So. 3d 95, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19075, 2014 WL 6488761 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyree Jabari Spratt appeals his judgment and sentences, asserting that his convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm violate his rights against double jeopardy, in light of his conviction for attempted burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and with a firearm, which arose out of the same criminal episode. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate Spratt’s convictions for aggravated battery and aggravated assault.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tyree Jabari Spratt appeals his judgment and sentences, asserting that his convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm violate his rights against double jeopardy, in light of his conviction for attempted burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and with a firearm, which arose out of the same criminal episode. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate Spratt’s convictions for aggravated battery and aggravated assault.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 3d 95, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19075, 2014 WL 6488761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spratt-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.