Sprangers v. Philippi
This text of 190 N.W.2d 136 (Sprangers v. Philippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The initial determination to be made in this case is whether there is an appealable judgment or order.
The notice of appeal states it is taken from a judgment. However, there is no judgment of record. The trial court’s memorandum decision is an order for judgment.
*405 An order directing the entry of judgment is not an ap-pealable order under sec. 274.33, Stats.; Mitler v. Associated Contractors (1958), 3 Wis. 2d 331, 332, 88 N. W. 2d 672; Lentz v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. (1963), 19 Wis. 2d 569, 120 N. W. 2d 722. The reason such an order is not appealable under sec. 274.33 is that it does not prevent a judgment from which an appeal can betaken.
In State ex rel. Hernandez v. McConahey (1969), 42 Wis. 2d 468, 471, 167 N. W. 2d 412, this court stated:
“. . . The duty rests upon counsel to obtain a sufficient order or judgment upon which to predicate an appeal. . . .”
We again urge appellants’ counsel to give more attention to the appealability issue on all appeals to this court.
By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 N.W.2d 136, 52 Wis. 2d 403, 1971 Wisc. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprangers-v-philippi-wis-1971.