Sprague v. Soule

35 Mich. 35, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 227
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1876·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Marston, J.:

A bill of interpleader is a bill filed for the protection of a person from whom several persons claim legally or equitably the same thing, debt, or duty; but who has incurred no independent liability to any of them, and does not himself claim an interest in the matter. — Adams’ Eq., 202. And it is essential, among other things that the party seeking relief has incurred no independent liability to either claimant.— Id., 204. In this case the bill alleges that *complainant incurred the liability under an express agreement with some of the parties against whom he now claims relief. [35]*35Such being the ease he is not entitled to the relief he now seeks.

The decree dismissing the hill must he affirmed, with costs.

The other justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sprague v. Soule, 35 Mich. 35, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 227 (Mich. 1876).

35 Mich. 35 (Sprague v. Soule) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gairing v. McClelland
18 N.W.2d 838 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1945)
Chas. H. Steffey, Inc. v. American Bank Stationery Co.
155 A. 306 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1931)
Detroit Trust Co. v. Hunrath
131 N.W. 147 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamara
130 N.W. 653 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Love v. Hartford Life Insurance
132 S.W. 335 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Moore v. Barnheisel
8 N.W. 531 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)