Sprague v. Penrose
162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 347, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 349
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tbenchabd, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Bbogan, Van Busiciek, Kays, Deab, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sprague v. Penrose, 162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 347, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 349 (N.J. 1932).
162 A. 582 (Sprague v. Penrose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.