Sprague v. Mumford

1 How. Pr. 67
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 67 (Sprague v. Mumford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sprague v. Mumford, 1 How. Pr. 67 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant did not use due diligence in ascertaining in what particular the declaration had been amended, after he was informed it was amended.

Decision.-—Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprague-v-mumford-nysupct-1844.