Sprague v. Engelbrecht

29 Misc. 464, 61 N.Y.S. 952
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

If power were granted to make an allowance herein to both plaintiff and defendant I should allow plaintiff $300 and the defendant $200, inasmuch as defendant succeeded upon the ■question whether there should be a sale or an actual partition. As I construe the case, I am not permi^ed to award costs and an ¡allowance to the defendant on actual partition; hence I think it fair that no allowance be granted to the plaintiff. I think if •defendant pays one-half of the plaintiff’s costs, about the same result would be reached as if there had been a sale and allowances made upon the basis above suggested.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sprague v. Engelbrecht, 29 Misc. 464, 61 N.Y.S. 952 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

29 Misc. 464 (Sprague v. Engelbrecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crossman v. Wyckoff
64 A.D. 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Sprague v. Elgelbrecht
62 N.Y.S. 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)