Sprague v. Bartholdi Hotel Co.

22 N.Y.S. 1090, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 663, 68 Hun 555
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 14, 1893·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the opinion of the court below, upon the decision of the motion resulting in the order appealed from, we think the order was right, and should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sprague v. Bartholdi Hotel Co., 22 N.Y.S. 1090, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 663, 68 Hun 555 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

22 N.Y.S. 1090 (Sprague v. Bartholdi Hotel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
83 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Associated Sales Analysts, Inc. v. Weitz
25 A.D.2d 64 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
In re the Estate of Friedman
166 Misc. 664 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
Seiler v. Klugman
164 A.D. 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Lass v. Volk Housewrecking Co.
129 N.Y.S. 150 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Weil v. Manheim
66 Misc. 565 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1910)
Hunt v. Sullivan
79 A.D. 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Fransioli v. Boorman
84 N.Y.S. 128 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Spaulding v. American Wood Board Co.
58 A.D. 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)