Spragg v. Dulaney

88 Pa. D. & C. 499, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 308
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County
DecidedMarch 22, 1954
Docketno. 38
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Pa. D. & C. 499 (Spragg v. Dulaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spragg v. Dulaney, 88 Pa. D. & C. 499, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 308 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954).

Opinion

Hook, P. J.,

Rae B. Spragg, clerk of the orphans’ court of this county, filed a petition for a declaratory judgment against Harold Dulaney, register of wills, to declare the right, status and duties of the clerk of the orphans’ court and the register of wills on accounts of executors and administrators, which under the law are filed with the register of wills and transmitted by him to the clerk of the orphans’ court for audit and confirmation. In Greene County, a sixth class county, the register of wills is also recorder of deeds, and the clerk of the orphans’ court is also clerk of the court of quarter session and oyer and terminer. Although both are salaried officers, and the fees of their respective offices go into the county treasury, each should be credited for the services performed.

To decide the questions raised by the petition, it is necessary that we ascertain the statutory duties required of each office on accounts transmitted by the register to the clerk.

Section 6, Rule 5, of the Orphans’ Court Rules of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, approved December 30, 1942, effective the first Monday of July 1943, provides:

“The following accounts shall be filed in the office of the Register of Wills: (a) An account of an executor or administrator.”

Section 702 of the Fiduciaries Act of April 18,1949, P. L. 512, 20 PS §320.702, provides: “The account of the personal representative shall be filed in the office of the Register.” This is based on section 6(5) of the Supreme Court Rules.

From the effective date of the Act of March 15, 1832, P. L. 135, sec. 30, the register was required [501]*501to prepare and present a certified copy of an account filed in Ms office to the orphans’ court of the respective county: Yocum v. Commercial National Bank of Pennsylvania, 195 Pa. 411, 414. The practice of the register presenting a certified copy of an account to the clerk was changed by the Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, sec. 46(d), which provided:

“Every register, with whom an account has been or shall be filed, shall transmit the same to the Orphans’ Court of the respective county, at its next stated meet- . ing.”

Section 403 of the Register of Wills Act of June 28, 1951, P. L. 638, 20 PS §1840.403, provides:

“All accounts filed with the register shall be transmitted to the court for audit and confirmation on dates fixed by the court by general rule or special order and shall be advertised as required by law.”

Since the register of wills is not required to record accounts of executors and administrators filed in his office, either under the Register of Wills Act of June 28, 1951, P. L. 638, or the Fiduciaries Act of April 18,1949, P. L. 512, we conclude that the statutory duty imposed on the register of wills on accounts of executors and administrators is to receive the account for filing, and transmit it to the clerk of the orphans’ court. While the Act of August 21, 1953, P. L. 371, effective January 1, 1954, 20 PS §2046, prescribing the fees to be received by the register of wills in counties of the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth class, provides: “Accounts: Filing, recording accounts of executors, administrators and guardians, including transmission of same to Orphans’ Court and confirmation; first page double space $15.00, and each additional page $1.00; first page single space $15.00, and each additional page $1.50,” it does not fix a fee specifically scheduled therein for the services performed by the register in filing and transmitting accounts to the orphans’ court. [502]*502However, this failure has been taken care of by Section 209 of the Register of Wills Act of 1951, which reads: “The court may establish a bill of costs to be charged for the service of the register not otherwise specifically provided by law,” and the Act of 195B prescribing the fees to be received by the register of wills, which contains the following provision: “Fees for similar services not herein specifically scheduled shall be charged on the same basis as those scheduled.”

It is also necessary that we ascertain the statutory duty imposed on the clerk of the orphans’ court on accounts transmitted by the register of wills to the orphans’ court for audit and confirmation. After the account has been transmitted to the orphans’ court, the clerk, in accordance with section 505 of the Orphans’ Court Act of 1951, 20 PS §2080.505, must give notice by advertisement of the time when accounts filed with him and with the register will be presented to the court for confirmation, stating in the advertisement the names and capacities of the respective accounts, and under section 502 of that act, and Rule No. 24, sec. 3, of the Orphans’ Court Rules of this county, the clerk shall enter into a docket provided for that purpose a record of said account, and after the account has been presented to the court, confirm the same. We conclude therefore that the statutory duty imposed on the clerk of courts as to accounts of executors and administrators transmitted to said office by the register of wills is to file, advertise, record and confirm.

The Act of August 21, 1953, P. L. 370, effective January 1, 1954, 20 PS §2224, prescribing the fees to be received by the clerk of the orphans’ court of counties of the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth class, provides:

“Accounts: Filing, recording, and setting up printed copies of advertisement of accounts of trustees and [503]*503guardians, including certificate of the clerk; first page double space typewriting $11.00, each additional page, double space typewriting $1.00; first page single space typewriting $12.00, each additional page, single space typewriting $2.00.”

It is to be noted that the above act fails to provide a fee for the clerk on accounts of executors and administrators transmitted by the register of wills to the orphans’ court. However, section 503 of the Orphans’ Court Act of 1951, provides:

“Each orphans’ court may establish a bill of costs to be charged for the services of the clerk not otherwise provided for by law”. The Act of 1953 prescribing the fees to be received by the clerk of the orphans’ court, supra, contains the following: “Fees for similar services not specifically scheduled shall be charged on the same basis as those herein scheduled.”

Since the acts prescribing the fees to be received by the register of wills and the act prescribing the fees to be received by the clerk of courts failed to specifically schedule a fee or fees for the statutory services rendered by the register of wills and the clerk of the orphans’ court on accounts of executors and administrators, it is the duty of this court, as hereinbefore stated, to establish a fee to be charged for the services of the register of wills and the clerk of courts, respectively.

In this county the register of wills has been collecting the fee established by the Act of 1953, and the clerk has been collecting the fee prescribed by the Fee Bill of 1953, each officer contending that because of the services performed, that they are entitled to the same. The register of wills, in addition to filing and transmitting the accounts to the orphans’ court, has been preparing a copy thereof and filing the same in his office, a duty which is not now required either by statute or rule of court.

[504]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yocum v. Commercial National Bank
46 A. 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Pa. D. & C. 499, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spragg-v-dulaney-pactcomplgreene-1954.