Spradling v. State
573 So. 2d 446, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 670, 1991 WL 9383
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 1991
DocketNo. 90-01102
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 573 So. 2d 446 (Spradling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spradling v. State, 573 So. 2d 446, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 670, 1991 WL 9383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we strike the provision in the judgment which assesses a public defender fee against appellant, because the record indicates these costs were imposed without prior notice or the opportunity to be heard. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of the fee after adequate notice to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mitchell v. State
573 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 446, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 670, 1991 WL 9383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spradling-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.