Spradling v. State
573 So. 2d 446, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 670, 1991 WL 9383
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1991·No. No. 90-01102·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we strike the provision in the judgment which assesses a public defender fee against appellant, because the record indicates these costs were imposed without prior notice or the opportunity to be heard. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of the fee after adequate notice to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spradling v. State, 573 So. 2d 446, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 670, 1991 WL 9383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
573 So. 2d 446 (Spradling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
573 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)