Spradlin v. Kendall

6 Ky. Op. 439, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 203
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 7, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ky. Op. 439 (Spradlin v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spradlin v. Kendall, 6 Ky. Op. 439, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 203 (Ky. Ct. App. 1873).

Opinion

OPINION by

Judge Hardin :

The covenant of the marshal and his sureties that he would perform his official duties which, in this case, were those of a constable, seem to be sufficiently alleged in the original petition, as well as a breach of that covenant. There is an apparent defect of parties, as the averments' of the petition only impart that the plaintiff Spradlin was the equitable, and not the legal holder of the executions against Dory and others. But this defect was not reached by the general demurrer, and was not made the ground of specific objection, and it was error to sustain the general demurrer for a special cause, not assigned. (Civil Code, Secs. 120-121.)

Wherefore, that being the only apparent defect in the petition, especially as amended, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ky. Op. 439, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spradlin-v-kendall-kyctapp-1873.