Spradlin v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Spradlin v. Jordan

577 So. 2d 448, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 206, 1991 WL 47495

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 8, 1991

Docket89-1075

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 577 So. 2d 448 (Spradlin v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spradlin v. Jordan, 577 So. 2d 448, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 206, 1991 WL 47495 (Ala. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ALMON, Justice.

Dave Spradlin appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Roger Jordan $40,000 in an action based on malicious prosecution. Spradlin appeared pro se in the trial and in this appeal. All of his arguments relate to allegations concerning the conduct of the trial. He has not made any arrangements for the preparation of a transcript of the trial or for any substitute therefor. See Rule 10, Ala.R.App.P.; Seidler v. Phillips, 496 So.2d 714 (Ala.1986); Trimble v. City of Prichard, 438 So.2d 745 (Ala. 1983). Spradlin makes references in his brief to his inability to pay for a transcript, but he has not made any effort to comply with Rule 10(d), Ala.R.App.P. Cf. Wheeler v. Alabama National Bank of Montgomery, 262 Ala. 36, 76 So.2d 679 (1954); Ex parte Tsimpides, 272 Ala. 430, 131 So.2d 873 (1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 804, 82 S.Ct. 644, 7 L.Ed.2d 551 (1962). Having nothing to review, we must affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALMON, Justice.

Dave Spradlin appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Roger Jordan $40,000 in an action based on malicious prosecution. Spradlin appeared pro se in the trial and in this appeal. All of his arguments relate to allegations concerning the conduct of the trial. He has not made any arrangements for the preparation of a transcript of the trial or for any substitute therefor. See Rule 10, Ala.R.App.P.; Seidler v. Phillips, 496 So.2d 714 (Ala.1986); Trimble v. City of Prichard, 438 So.2d 745 (Ala. 1983). Spradlin makes references in his brief to his inability to pay for a transcript, but he has not made any effort to comply with Rule 10(d), Ala.R.App.P. Cf. Wheeler v. Alabama National Bank of Montgomery, 262 Ala. 36, 76 So.2d 679 (1954); Ex parte Tsimpides, 272 Ala. 430, 131 So.2d 873 (1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 804, 82 S.Ct. 644, 7 L.Ed.2d 551 (1962). Having nothing to review, we must affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 So. 2d 448, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 206, 1991 WL 47495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spradlin-v-jordan-ala-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack