Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc.

578 So. 2d 1251, 1991 WL 82151, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 424

Opinion

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of April 5, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:

This appeal is dismissed because the appellant has failed to submit an argument that contains the “contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.” See A.R.App.P. 28(a)(5) and Stephens v. Lindsey, 542 So.2d 278 (Ala.1989).

ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; DISMISSED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.