Spradley v. United States

162 F.2d 203, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1947·No. No. 10300·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered by the Court on the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel for respective parties;

And it appearing from the judgment duly entered by the District Court that appellant entered a plea of guilty to both counts of the indictment, and it further appearing that the present claim of the appellant, presented by briefs and argument on this appeal without having previously been made in the District Court, that appellant did not plead to the second count of the indictment, is not established by the record considered in its entirety;

And the action of the District Court in imposing separate nonconcurrent sentences under each of the two counts not being erroneous; York v. United States, 6 Cir., 299 F. 778; Record v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 215, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 703, 62 S.Ct. 1310, 86 L.Ed. 1771;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spradley v. United States, 162 F.2d 203, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120 (6th Cir. 1947).

162 F.2d 203 (Spradley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Calvert
443 F. Supp. 508 (M.D. Tennessee, 1977)
Crawford v. United States
214 F.2d 313 (Sixth Circuit, 1954)
Chambers v. District of Columbia
194 F.2d 336 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Sharpe v. United States
168 F.2d 839 (Sixth Circuit, 1948)