Spradley v. State

138 S.E. 287, 36 Ga. App. 739, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket17885
StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.E. 287 (Spradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spradley v. State, 138 S.E. 287, 36 Ga. App. 739, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Only the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are insisted upon; there is some evidence to support the verdict; the judge of the city court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the judge of the superior court properly overruled the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S.E. 287, 36 Ga. App. 739, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spradley-v-state-gactapp-1927.