Spradley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Spradley v. State

86 S.E. 738, 17 Ga. App. 327, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 29, 1915

Docket6720

StatusPublished

This text of 86 S.E. 738 (Spradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spradley v. State, 86 S.E. 738, 17 Ga. App. 327, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. Considered in connection with the charge as a whole, the excerpts complained of contain no error sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

2. While the evidence is altogether circumstantial, it sufficiently supports the verdict of guilty, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.

3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

1. Considered in connection with the charge as a whole, the excerpts complained of contain no error sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

2. While the evidence is altogether circumstantial, it sufficiently supports the verdict of guilty, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.

3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 S.E. 738, 17 Ga. App. 327, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spradley-v-state-gactapp-1915.