S.P.R. v. Department of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.P.R. v. Department of Children and Families

210 So. 3d 734

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 2017

DocketCase 2D16-3011, 2D16-3394

StatusPublished

This text of 210 So. 3d 734 (S.P.R. v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.P.R. v. Department of Children and Families, 210 So. 3d 734 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

S.P.R. and B.F. (the parents) appeal the denial of their motions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at the trial of the Department of Children and Families’ petition to terminate their parental rights to their infant daughter. The parents filed timely motions, which were deemed denied after the trial court failed to dispose of the motions within twenty-five days after filing. J.B. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 170 So.3d 780, 794-795 (Fla. 2015). We affirm the denial of relief. 1

The Department presented uncontested evidence that between the ages of two and five months, the infant suffered fourteen fractures to fourteen different bones. When these injuries were discovered, they were at different stages of healing, demonstrating that they did not occur in a single traumatic event. The child had never been to daycare and never had a babysitter. Yet, the parents provided conflicting explanations for the cause of the fractures.

We have reviewed carefully the records on appeal. Based on the standard established by the supreme court in J.B., we conclude that trial counsel’s alleged deficiencies did not “so prejudice[ ] the outcome of the TPR proceeding that but for counsel’s deficient representation the parent’s rights would not have been terminated.” Id. at 792-93. 2 Accordingly, we affirm the order terminating the parents’ rights to their daughter and the disposition of the motions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

1

. We have consolidated these appeals.

2

. The supreme court is in the process of adopting a rule of procedure for bringing and resolving claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in termination of parental rights cases. See Joint Report of the Select Committee on Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings, In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.146, No. SC16-553 (Fla. Mar. 31, 2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaROSE, Judge.

S.P.R. and B.F. (the parents) appeal the denial of their motions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at the trial of the Department of Children and Families’ petition to terminate their parental rights to their infant daughter. The parents filed timely motions, which were deemed denied after the trial court failed to dispose of the motions within twenty-five days after filing. J.B. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 170 So.3d 780, 794-795 (Fla. 2015). We affirm the denial of relief. 1

The Department presented uncontested evidence that between the ages of two and five months, the infant suffered fourteen fractures to fourteen different bones. When these injuries were discovered, they were at different stages of healing, demonstrating that they did not occur in a single traumatic event. The child had never been to daycare and never had a babysitter. Yet, the parents provided conflicting explanations for the cause of the fractures.

We have reviewed carefully the records on appeal. Based on the standard established by the supreme court in J.B., we conclude that trial counsel’s alleged deficiencies did not “so prejudice[ ] the outcome of the TPR proceeding that but for counsel’s deficient representation the parent’s rights would not have been terminated.” Id. at 792-93. 2 Accordingly, we affirm the order terminating the parents’ rights to their daughter and the disposition of the motions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

1

. We have consolidated these appeals.

2

. The supreme court is in the process of adopting a rule of procedure for bringing and resolving claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in termination of parental rights cases. See Joint Report of the Select Committee on Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings, In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.146, No. SC16-553 (Fla. Mar. 31, 2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 So. 3d 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spr-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack