Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels

600 F. App'x 894
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2015·No. No. 15-6041·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Andre Spotts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden, No. 3:14-cv-25644 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 15 & Dec. 8, 2014). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [895] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels, 600 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2015).

600 F. App'x 894 (Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241