Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels

600 F. App'x 894
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15-6041
StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 894 (Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels, 600 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Andre Spotts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden, No. 3:14-cv-25644 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 15 & Dec. 8, 2014). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [895]*895court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spotts-v-united-states-penitentiary-warden-daniels-ca4-2015.