Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels
This text of 600 F. App'x 894 (Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kelvin Andre Spotts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spotts v. United States Penitentiary Warden, No. 3:14-cv-25644 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 15 & Dec. 8, 2014). We deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [895]*895court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spotts-v-united-states-penitentiary-warden-daniels-ca4-2015.