Spottiswoode v. Morris & Essex Railroad

44 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 667, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 106
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 A. 1100 (Spottiswoode v. Morris & Essex Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spottiswoode v. Morris & Essex Railroad, 44 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 667, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 106 (N.J. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Circuit Court brought here by this writ is founded on a verdict of a jury in an action of ejectment. After the verdict a rule to show cause why it should not be set aside was allowed to the defendant, reserving defendant’s exceptions. The rule was certified to the Supreme Court for its advisory opinion. That court, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Depue, reported in 32 Vroom 322, advised the Circuit Court to discharge the rule.

The Circuit Court discharged the rule and entered judgment. Thereupon this writ was brought.

The questions raised upon the exceptions are those which were discussed in the Supreme Court and were there decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error. We are of opinion that those questions were correctly solved in the Supreme Court. For reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Depue, the judgment will be affirmed.

[668]*668For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Depue, Yan Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams/ Yredenburgh. 14.

For reversal-^EouQ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J & M Land Co. v. First Union National Bank
766 A.2d 1110 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
J & M LAND CO. v. First Union Nat. Bank
742 A.2d 583 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Predham v. Holfester
108 A.2d 458 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 667, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spottiswoode-v-morris-essex-railroad-nj-1899.