Spota v. City of New York
This text of 283 A.D. 973 (Spota v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from an order which denied their motion to review a previous determination pursuant to subdivision (bb) of rule 2 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, which marked the action off the General Calendar and placed it on the Deferred Calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion to restore action to the General Calendar granted, without costs. In our opinion the proof presented was sufficient to entitle plaintiffs to the relief applied for. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 973, 130 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spota-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1954.