Sports Car Centre of Syracuse, Ltd. v. Bombard

262 A.D.2d 1055, 691 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7300
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1999
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 1055 (Sports Car Centre of Syracuse, Ltd. v. Bombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sports Car Centre of Syracuse, Ltd. v. Bombard, 262 A.D.2d 1055, 691 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; see also, Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 1055, 691 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sports-car-centre-of-syracuse-ltd-v-bombard-nyappdiv-1999.