Sporn v. Suffolk Marketing, Inc.
This text of 81 A.D.2d 663 (Sporn v. Suffolk Marketing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action for moneys allegedly due pursuant to an oral contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 11, 1980, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the Statute of Frauds. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, and complaint dismissed. The plaintiff’s claim is barred by the Statute of Frauds. (See General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 10; Freedman v Chemical Constr. Corp., 43 NY2d 260; Rogoff v San Juan Racing Assn., 77 AD2d 831.) Lazer, J.P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.D.2d 663, 438 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sporn-v-suffolk-marketing-inc-nyappdiv-1981.