Spoor v. CHUHRAN
723 N.W.2d 900, 477 Mich. 953
This text of 723 N.W.2d 900 (Spoor v. CHUHRAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spoor v. CHUHRAN, 723 N.W.2d 900, 477 Mich. 953 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Patricia A. SPOOR, Personal Representative of the Estate of James J. Lewis, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jeffrey CHUHRAN, Joseph Cicchelli, Jeremy Kastl, Keven Kastl, and Dorie R. Kastl, Defendants-Appellees, and
Annette Jones and Michael R. Jones, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Home-Owners Insurance Company v. Bonnville
723 N.W.2d 900 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 N.W.2d 900, 477 Mich. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spoor-v-chuhran-mich-2006.