Spooner v. State
This text of 354 So. 2d 1248 (Spooner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgments of conviction are affirmed, but the sentences are vacated and the case remanded for resentencing with directions that the trial court disclose to the defendant, a reasonable time prior to sentencing, any factual material contained in the confidential portion of the presentence investigation which is not found in the non-confidential portion. Campbell v. State, 342 So.2d 1010 (Fla.4th DCA 1977); Bronson v. State, 345 So.2d 872 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Cunningham v. State, 349 So.2d 702 (Fla.4th DCA 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 So. 2d 1248, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spooner-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.