Spooner v. State

354 So. 2d 1248, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14938
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1978·No. No. 76-2464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed, but the sentences are vacated and the case remanded for resentencing with directions that the trial court disclose to the defendant, a reasonable time prior to sentencing, any factual material contained in the confidential portion of the presentence investigation which is not found in the non-confidential portion. Campbell v. State, 342 So.2d 1010 (Fla.4th DCA 1977); Bronson v. State, 345 So.2d 872 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Cunningham v. State, 349 So.2d 702 (Fla.4th DCA 1977).

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spooner v. State, 354 So. 2d 1248, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

354 So. 2d 1248 (Spooner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fungone v. State
391 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)