Spooner v. Gilmore
136 Mass. 248, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 73
Opinion
The answer, under which the case was tried, did not contain such a special denial of the genuineness of the signature of the note, and demand that it should be proved at the trial, as the Pub. Sts. c. 167, § 21, require. The ruling was wrong in this respect, and we cannot say that it became immaterial in the course of the trial.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spooner v. Gilmore, 136 Mass. 248, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 73 (Mass. 1884).
136 Mass. 248 (Spooner v. Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ideal Concrete Block Co. v. Fries
25 Mass. App. Dec. 109 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1962)
Salvato v. DiSILVA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.
108 N.E.2d 51 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1952)
Boutillier v. Wesinger
78 N.E.2d 195 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Griffin v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
181 N.E. 839 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Scholl v. Gilman
160 N.E. 889 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
Dean v. Vice
234 Mass. 13 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)
Kirschner v. Millard
97 Misc. 704 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)