Sponzilli v. Houston
This text of 24 Ohio Law. Abs. 619 (Sponzilli v. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[620]*620OPINION
The evidence shows that the appellant received injuries by slipping upon a public sidewalk that was uneven and covered with ice and snow.
There is no allegation or proof that the appellee caused the condition.
The duty to keep the streets, which, of course, includes the sidewalks, open, in repair, and free from nuisance rests upon ibe municipality and not upon the abutting property owner.
It is clear under the authorities that the appellee failed to allege or prove the violation of any duty owing to the appellant.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ohio Law. Abs. 619, 1937 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sponzilli-v-houston-ohioctapp-1937.