Sponable v. Snyder

New York Supreme Court

Sponable v. Snyder

7 Hill & Den. 427

DecidedDecember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Hill & Den. 427 (Sponable v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sponable v. Snyder, 7 Hill & Den. 427 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The only question raised by the plaintiff in error and discussed here was, whether notice to the husband of Mrs. Snyder, of the prior unregistered mortgage to Rice, was equivalent to notice to her.

Senators Bockee, Johnson, Lott and Porter

delivered opinions, concurring in substance with the view taken of the question by Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the opinion of the supreme court. And .

On the question being put, “Shall this judgment be reversed?” all the members of the court present who heard the argument, seventeen in number, voted for affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The only question raised by the plaintiff in error and discussed here was, whether notice to the husband of Mrs. Snyder, of the prior unregistered mortgage to Rice, was equivalent to notice to her.

Senators Bockee, Johnson, Lott and Porter

delivered opinions, concurring in substance with the view taken of the question by Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the opinion of the supreme court. And .

On the question being put, “Shall this judgment be reversed?” all the members of the court present who heard the argument, seventeen in number, voted for affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Hill & Den. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sponable-v-snyder-nysupct-1844.