Spofford v. Rowan
6 N.Y. St. Rep. 250
This text of 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 250 (Spofford v. Rowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spofford v. Rowan, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 250 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the counterclaims pleaded are not available to the defendant in this action. The question has been fully and carefully discussed by Chief Justice McAdam, and we think that the judgment ought to be affirmed on his opinion. Reported in 3 N. Y. State Rep., 272.
Larremore, 0. J., and Bookstaver, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 N.Y. St. Rep. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spofford-v-rowan-nyctcompl-1887.