Spoerndle v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

88 Ohio St. 3d 542
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2000·No. Nos. 99-1269 and 99-1426·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spoerndle v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 88 Ohio St. 3d 542 (Ohio 2000).

88 Ohio St. 3d 542 (Spoerndle v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rollin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
761 N.E.2d 1057 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000)
Spoerndle v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
2000 Ohio 408 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)