Spodek v. Neiss

138 A.D.3d 824, 28 N.Y.S.3d 325
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2016
Docket2014-03709
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 824 (Spodek v. Neiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spodek v. Neiss, 138 A.D.3d 824, 28 N.Y.S.3d 325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered February 5, 2014, which, on the court’s own motion, appointed a receiver of certain premises in Brooklyn.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies as of right from an order which does not decide a motion made on notice, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Garcia v Eurobungy USA, 120 AD3d 623 [2014]).

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. Eurobungy USA
120 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 824, 28 N.Y.S.3d 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spodek-v-neiss-nyappdiv-2016.