S.P.M. v. J.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.P.M. v. J.P.

897 So. 2d 553, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 2005 WL 772195

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0284·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of February 15, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal is a final order or otherwise appealable nonfinal order. For this reason, the appeal is hereby dismissed. The appellant’s motion requesting the Court relinquish jurisdiction to the lower tribunal for purposes of clarification is denied. Furthermore, the “Appellant’s Request for Extension of Time to File an Initial Brief on the Merits,” filed on March 7, 2005, is denied as moot.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of February 15, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal is a final order or otherwise appealable nonfinal order. For this reason, the appeal is hereby dismissed. The appellant’s motion requesting the Court relinquish jurisdiction to the lower tribunal for purposes of clarification is denied. Furthermore, the “Appellant’s Request for Extension of Time to File an Initial Brief on the Merits,” filed on March 7, 2005, is denied as moot.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

S.P.M. v. J.P., 897 So. 2d 553, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 2005 WL 772195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

897 So. 2d 553 (S.P.M. v. J.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.