Splitt v. Splitt

320 S.W.3d 208, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1179, 2010 WL 3477860
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. ED 93642·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loan Splitt appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (judgment) dissolving her marriage to Kenneth Splitt. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence, Walsh v. Walsh, 184 S.W.3d 156, 157 (Mo.App. E.D.2006), and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in identifying and dividing the parties’ marital property. Pruitt v. Pruitt, 94 S.W.3d 429, 433-34 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Splitt v. Splitt, 320 S.W.3d 208, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1179, 2010 WL 3477860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 208 (Splitt v. Splitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Meltner
320 S.W.3d 208 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)