Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King
105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 524, 7 Gummere 524, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King, 105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 524, 7 Gummere 524, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1918).
105 A. 894 (Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Plotnick v. Deluccia
85 A.3d 1039 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Barbato v. Alsan Masonry & Concrete, Inc.
318 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)
Carr v. Campbell Soup Co.
307 A.2d 126 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)