Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King

105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 524, 7 Gummere 524, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 11, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 105 A. 894 (Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King, 105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 524, 7 Gummere 524, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plotnick v. Deluccia
85 A.3d 1039 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Barbato v. Alsan Masonry & Concrete, Inc.
318 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)
Carr v. Campbell Soup Co.
307 A.2d 126 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 524, 7 Gummere 524, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/splitdorf-electrical-co-v-king-nj-1918.