Splawn v. California

414 U.S. 1120, 94 S. Ct. 855
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1974·No. No. 73-200·Published

Opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. [1121]*1121California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Splawn v. California, 414 U.S. 1120, 94 S. Ct. 855 (1974).

414 U.S. 1120 (Splawn v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. California
413 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
413 U.S. 49 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Heller v. New York
413 U.S. 483 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Roaden v. Kentucky
413 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Alexander v. Virginia
413 U.S. 836 (Supreme Court, 1973)
United States v. Orito
413 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1973)