Splain v. Utica Gas & Electric Co.

86 N.Y.S. 1147

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant’s negligence was one of fact for the jury; also held, that the plaintiff was not barred from recovery by reason of the fact that he did not own the fee of the land upon which the tree' stood. See Donohue v. Keystone Gas Co. (decided by this court at present term) 85 N. Y. Supp. 478.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Splain v. Utica Gas & Electric Co., 86 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

86 N.Y.S. 1147 (Splain v. Utica Gas & Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donahue v. Keystone Gas Co.
90 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)