Spivey v. Timco Aviation Services
This text of 629 F. App'x 575 (Spivey v. Timco Aviation Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,
James Spivey, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Spivey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Spivey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 F. App'x 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spivey-v-timco-aviation-services-ca4-2016.