Spivey v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2025·No. 1D2024-3117·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-3117 _____________________________

FLOYD SPIVEY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceeding.

April 16, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the petitioner’s postconviction motion, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792, 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (citing supreme court decisions as authority for dismissal). LEWIS, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Floyd Spivey, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spivey v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Spivey v. State of Florida (Spivey v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.