Spivey v. State of Florida
This text of Spivey v. State of Florida (Spivey v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-3117 _____________________________
FLOYD SPIVEY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceeding.
April 16, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on the petitioner’s postconviction motion, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792, 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (citing supreme court decisions as authority for dismissal). LEWIS, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Floyd Spivey, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Spivey v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spivey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.