Spivey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Spivey v. State

863 S.W.2d 682, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1655, 1993 WL 429220

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1993·No. No. 63451·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Wallace Spivey, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for capital murder for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole for a minimum of fifty years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Wallace Spivey, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for capital murder for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole for a minimum of fifty years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Spivey v. State, 863 S.W.2d 682, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1655, 1993 WL 429220 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

863 S.W.2d 682 (Spivey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.