Spivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Spivey v. State

477 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2409, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16441

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 25, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2561

StatusPublished

This text of 477 So. 2d 648 (Spivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spivey v. State, 477 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2409, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16441 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for sexual battery and kidnapping.

We find no merit in his contentions except his contention that there was error in retaining jurisdiction over the first one-third of his sentence. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Carter v. State, 464 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we strike that portion of the sentence retaining jurisdiction.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI