Spivey v. State
477 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2409, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16441
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spivey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 401 →
Opinion
We affirm defendant’s convictions for sexual battery and kidnapping.
We find no merit in his contentions except his contention that there was error in retaining jurisdiction over the first one-third of his sentence. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Carter v. State, 464 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we strike that portion of the sentence retaining jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spivey v. State, 477 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2409, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16441 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
477 So. 2d 648 (Spivey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkins v. State
463 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Carter v. State
464 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)