Spivey v. Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority

633 F. App'x 839
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 29, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2173
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 633 F. App'x 839 (Spivey v. Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spivey v. Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority, 633 F. App'x 839 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Spivey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging disability discrimination and retaliation. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Spivey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Spivey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benisek v. Lamone
266 F. Supp. 3d 799 (D. Maryland, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spivey-v-research-triangle-regional-public-transportation-authority-ca4-2016.